Bailey's Prize 2017 Series: The Power by Naomi Alderman



 This is the first of the reviews I have done on the shortlisted books for the Bailey's Women's Prize for Fiction for the year 2017. The shortlist was announced on April 3rd, 2017. For more reviews, subscribe!







Every day, there seems to be more reports coming out about the various injustices done to a woman – or rather someone who is not a man. There are the girls brutally defiled and violated on the streets in public. The child who has been repeatedly raped by her male relatives. The grandmother who was murdered in cold blood because she refused to fund her grandson’s various activities.

And don’t you wish, if only things were different, if only you could do something about them.

That is the premise of The Power by Naomi Alderman. Alderman’s latest has been gathering colourful reviews and has been shortlisted for the Bailey’s Women’s Prize for Fiction 2017. This is the first of the six shortlisted books I have read, and I decided to pen down my thoughts.

I have a feeling The Power is going to be one of those books that stand the test of time, like Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. In Alderman’s alternate reality, young girls (in an unspecified century, but definitely the modern era with the technology and the nasty internet forums) develop an organ that allows them to transmit electric shocks. Young girls can then awaken the power in older women. Unlike most sci-fi, The Power is set at the time when the changes take place, to form a society much different than our own. The book follows the changes told through the experiences of four people: Allie (later Mother Eve) who uses the power to establish a permanent home (although the word home is never specifically used); Roxy – the daughter of a London criminal who later becomes strong enough to take on the business herself rather than her half-brothers; Margot – the mayor of a town in the US whose power is awakened by her daughter (who has less control than her) which leads to her growing more ambitious and dare we say, corrupt(?); and then the only male perspective we get, that of Tunde, a Nigerian student studying in America who decides to chronicle the revolutionary changes occurring in different parts of the world.

It starts well enough, fairly; women trying to use the power to protect themselves. This of course grows to be used as a weapon to claim physical and political power in different countries – we see this through the eyes (words) of Tunde. Meanwhile, Allie uses her extreme control of the electric shocks to perform “miracles” raising her status as someone divine, a prophet perhaps that people turn to. Roxy finds Mother Eve who gives her the strength to run things herself. Then there’s Margo whose slow ascension to political apex we see. 

Then the situation avalanches. There are women who, obviously frustrated with all men, take things to the extreme. The story reflects the fact that, it doesn’t matter who you are, if you have infinite power that goes unchecked (in the book it’s the titular power, in today’s world, money), you get hungry for more, you get arrogant, and you start to do things that you might have never thought you would. Or someone will. There are women who use their power to ill-treat and mock her male subjects (like the Moldova President Tatiana Moskalev), there are women who rape and mutilate men and so forth. 

The book begins and ends with letters between Neil (who writes The Power in the story) and Naomi (of whom he is seeking validation). The letters are vastly reflective of their society – it is ours, only upside down. The man doubts himself, the man is domesticated, male babies are aborted, male genital mutilation and on the list goes. The main thing the book gets you to think about, will the world really be a better place if it’s exact opposite thing happening?

But, don’t count this is as a reason for why feminism is not good – it’s rather the opposite. Feminism is after all, about equality – no more, no less.

However, I found the ending to be slightly confusing and anti-climactic. Clever readers will infer what has happened of course through the letters between Neil and Naomi. One is not really sure though of what has happened – although history is often that way. As is written in the book: “This is the trouble with history. You can’t see what’s not there. You can look at an empty space and see that’s something’s missing, but there’s no way to know what it was.”

That said, this book has been very well written (and it turns out Naomi Alderman has written Doctor Who stories too). The Bailey’s Prize nomination is well deserved and it is a must-read book. Recommended for: fans of Margaret Atwood, fans of Ursula Le Guinn, sci-fi readers, women’s fiction readers, Bailey’ Prize readers and of course anyone who wished to ponder about the upside-down world.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Must-Read Non-Fiction for 2018: A Few Recommendations

A Summer in Aleppey

Jacobinte Swargarajyam - A Review